高级搜索
田红, 程智, 谢五三, 戴娟. 2020: 2020年安徽梅雨异常特征及预测前兆信号分析. 暴雨灾害, 39(6): 564-570. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9045.2020.06.003
引用本文: 田红, 程智, 谢五三, 戴娟. 2020: 2020年安徽梅雨异常特征及预测前兆信号分析. 暴雨灾害, 39(6): 564-570. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9045.2020.06.003
TIAN Hong, CHENG Zhi, XIE Wusan, DAI Juan. 2020: Analysis on the characteristics of Meiyu anomaly and prediction precursor signal in Anhui Province in 2020. Torrential Rain and Disasters, 39(6): 564-570. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9045.2020.06.003
Citation: TIAN Hong, CHENG Zhi, XIE Wusan, DAI Juan. 2020: Analysis on the characteristics of Meiyu anomaly and prediction precursor signal in Anhui Province in 2020. Torrential Rain and Disasters, 39(6): 564-570. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9045.2020.06.003

2020年安徽梅雨异常特征及预测前兆信号分析

Analysis on the characteristics of Meiyu anomaly and prediction precursor signal in Anhui Province in 2020

  • 摘要: 基于安徽省气象台站降水资料和NCEP再分析数据,分析了2020年安徽梅雨气候异常特征及其成因,评估了汛期预测效果及其预测前兆信号的有效性。结果表明:(1)2020年安徽6月2日入梅,8月1日出梅,梅雨期长度为60 d,梅雨量沿江江南1 057 mm,江淮之间810 mm,多地降水强度创历史极值。综合来看,梅雨期之长、覆盖范围之广、累计雨量之大、梅雨强度之强,均为1961年以来第一位。(2)梅雨异常偏多的主要原因是6—7月乌拉尔山、东西伯利亚-鄂霍茨克海附近阻塞高压活跃,东亚沿海500 hPa位势高度距平场上EAP波列的形势明显,夏季风偏弱,西太平洋副热带高压(副高)异常偏强偏西偏南,有利于冷暖空气在安徽交汇,副高西侧向安徽省的水汽输送异常偏强,水汽辐合明显;梅雨期偏长的原因是副高脊线6月偏北、7月偏南,导致入梅偏早、出梅偏迟。(3)前期冬春季赤道中太平洋出现一次弱厄尔尼诺事件,虽然其对安徽梅雨指示意义不清晰,但响应信号印度洋海温和副高异常偏暖偏强。历史统计发现,符合这一特征的年份中,前冬赤道中东太平洋基本均为厄尔尼诺状态,这些年份安徽梅雨偏多的概率很大。

     

    Abstract: Based on precipitation data at Anhui meteorological stations and NCEP reanalysis data, in this paper we analyze the characteristics and the causes of Meiyu climate anomaly in Anhui Province in 2020, and evaluate the skill of climate prediction and the effectiveness of prediction precursor signals. The main conclusions are as following. (1) In Anhui Province, Meiyu onset date was June 2 and outset date was August 1. Meiyu duration was 60 days. Meiyu precipitation was 1 057 mm in South along the Yangtze River and 810 mm between Yangtze River and Huaihe Rive, and the rainfall intensity in many places reached the historical extreme value in 2020. On the whole, the length of Meiyu period, the wide coverage, the large amount of accumulated rainfall and the intensity of Meiyu reached the top level since 1961. (2) The main reason for the abnormal Meiyu is that the blocking high is active near the Ural Mountain and the East Siberian-Okhotsk Sea from June to July. The EAP wave train on the 500 hPa geopotential height anomaly field along the East Asian coast is obvious. The summer monsoon is weak. The Western Pacific Subtropical High is abnormally strong and located too far to west and south, which is conducive to the convergence of cold and warm air in Anhui Province. The water vapor transport from the west side of the subtropical high to the province is extremely strong. The reason for the longer Meiyu period is that the ridge line of subtropical high is northward in June and southward in July, which leads to the early onset and late demise of Meiyu. (3) In the previous winter and spring, there was a weak El Niño event in the equatorial central Pacific Ocean. Although the indication of ist influence on Meiyu in Anhui Province is not clear, the response signal is that the Indian Ocean SST and subtropical high are abnormally warm and strong. According to historical statistics, if the equatorial Middle East Pacific Ocean is basically in El Niño state in previous winter, the probability of more intensive Meiyu in these years is very high. Therefore, the Indian Ocean SST and Western Pacific Subtropical High response factors can be used as the starting points to improve the prediction ability of Meiyu in weak El Niño years.

     

/

返回文章
返回